Talk:Donald Trump
Candle auction[edit]
How far will the bad mothing go [1]? Anna Livia (talk) 19:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Invasion of the body snatchers/robots[edit]
The usual sources of weird stories came up with this. Anna Livia (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I find it weirdly believable. Chillpilled (talk) 20:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Will add 'Maybot' to the discussion.
- The Romans (what did they do for us?) apparently had statues with separate heads, so they could be replaced with currently notable persons. Anna Livia (talk) 11:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Godwin's Law[edit]
Does this count? Anna Livia (talk) 21:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Biased[edit]
| ||
---|---|---|
Why is this article so biased? Donald Trump did so many great things for this country, but this article tries to smear him as a fascist (which is a communist ideology, while Trump is one of the greatest conservatives! Can someone fix this horrible article? — Unsigned, by: Zeb Smith / talk / contribs |
Circular sources?[edit]
I'm new to rational wiki but can't help but notice the abundance of bogus "sources" cited in this article, either from no publication at all, or from Wikipedia articles, which is obviously expressly prohibited on wiki pages. My question is, is rational wiki satire? Is it like the onion or BuzzFeed or is it meant to be an actual forum for debate the free exchange of ideas? And if the latter, what is the recommended protocol for making multiple edits in one sweep or is that even allowed? — Unsigned, by: Texaseliz / talk / contribs
- As to your first question, see RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article? If If you have specific problems with bad citation, or lack of citations, you can raise the issue here. Bongolian (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)